|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
Learn It, Live It, Love it
|
RamNation Forums2004 Awards and Rankings: Posts of the Year
Fourth-place Post of the YearPoster: Horn-E
Why, oh why,
Each month, each week
They bash us and trash us
I really don't get them
What's with these fluffies
Now not all of them are evil
And Alpo ain't always stupid
But most Buffs seldom show class
They say they get "ones"
Rarely, if ever,
And whether eating granola
Whenever we win
Yes, how quickly they forget
You see, some of you Buffs
Why do you come here,
So go wash your dreadlocks
You arrogant trustafarians
So go build your utopia
Then go back to Netfluffs
Or just go back to Boulder
=================================== Third-place Post of the YearPoster: JoninAZ
I keep reading articles by sports columnists and other media pundits who defend the BCS system and its architecture. There's this ongoing notion that teams from the MAC, WAC, Mountain West and others don't deserve equal access to the lucrative bowls. The BCS proponents, including many sports journalists, have their canned arguments: Level of talent; coaching, tradition, fan support, market size, etc. Fine. But let's, for fun, apply the same rules to the media world and create the Pulitzer Championship Series. The PCS. To start, take the six largest newspaper ownership groups (Gannett, Knight-Ridder, etc) and have them collude to guarantee that writers from their member papers get automatic spots in the final rounds of all Pulitzer Prize category judging. To show "fairness," allow for a couple of scenarios where journalists from independent papers or smaller, less glamorous chains MIGHT be considered in the voting (provided, of course, that pollsters from PCS-member chains help vote them into the final round - something they might do out of charity, as long as is doesn't interrupt their gravy train). Then each year shower the winning papers and those in their chains with hundreds of millions of dollars which they re-invest into larger newsroom budgets, salaries, hiring better staff, purchasing top of the line resources, etc. With each passing year, this disparity of funding for the "haves" and "have nots" shall grow, but that probably wouldn't affect a paper's ability to produce better quality stories, would it? Of course this would never happen because the media world would cry bloody murder and the PCS system would last about 5 seconds. The mere notion of denying a paper equal access to the top awards in that industry would be an affront to all in the profession and launch a million column inches of well versed wrath. Likewise, rewarding the six biggest chains with a disproportionate amount of opportunity, recognition, and more importantly - money - would be a slap in the face of media ethics. Even the biggest chains would cry foul in defense of their "smaller" brethren. So yes, it would never happen in the real world of journalism. But for some reason it's seemingly o.k. to actively or tacitly support the same concept when applied to young athletes in an amateur sport, playing for teams under the same organizational umbrella... the "all about fairness and equality while playing under the same rules" NCAA. It's time that sports journalists embrace not just freedom of speech and of the press, but actively petition the BCS for a redress of grievances. All Div. 1 football programs should have equal access to compete for bowl spots and every program should share in the Association's revenue. How is it fair that Boise State, Miami of Ohio, Utah, TCU and other teams have spilt gallons of blood on the field hoping for a tiny scrap from the table while Baylor, with a 1-7 conference record, will make millions this post-season after spilling nothing more than puddles of piss on fields across the Big 12? It isn't fair - and it's wrong. If you, as journalists, support the BCS, you might as well cheer for the PCS. At the very least, you should update your AP stylebooks to reflect the real definition of BCS: a Biased Consortium of Swindlers. =================================== Runner-up Post of the YearPoster: Horn-E
In anticipation of the throngs of new Rams, Buffs and others (some wanted, some definitely unwanted) visiting the Ramnation site to talk some football and throw a little smack in the upcoming 10 days, I have assembled a guide to help these virgin Ramnationers select an appropriate "handle" or "call sign." Some notably excellent (and available) nicknames for Ram Fans include the following (if a first-time Ramnationer, please feel free to select one from the list below if you are unsure of your creative naming skills and abilities): Ramzilla (for anyone who considers themselves a monster Ram fan)
If you want to show your hatred of Boulder and UCB to all fellow Ramnationers, consider these options: The Buff Rebuffer
However, not everyone wants to refer to themselves as a "Ram" of some type. Therefore, may I suggest selecting a handle that involves a famous, or somewhat comical, movie quote to express your unique persona. If taking this route, make sure to pick from a classic - Animal House, Fletch, Airplane, Austin Powers, Office Space or basically any Clint Eastwood movie are excellent examples. Or just make sure you make us laugh. Some of my personal favorites include: Dyin' Ain't Much of a Livin', Boy.
Special Note - Movie Quotes that are probably not such a good idea: Joey, do you like gladiator movies? If you're a buff, consider becoming a Ram Fan first, but if you unfortunately can't see the light and decide to stay on the Dark Side, try: Buffoon (appropriate for all of the fluffies)
If you're a hottie from cu you'll probably want to go with:
Celebrities Sightings:
RAMdy Moss
If you want more excellent examples of current Ram handles, here are some of my favorites: Good Shepherd
Hope that helps. Good luck choosing a handle. =================================== Post of the YearPoster: Jeremiah Johnson
The movie's closing scene -- a pressure packed Boulder Courtroom, District Attorney Mary Keenan has Coach Gary Barnett on the witness stand and on the ropes… BARNETT
KEENAN
BARNETT
KEENAN
BARNETT
BARNETT
I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a woman who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very victories I provide, then questions the manner in which I provide them. I'd prefer you just said thank you and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you stop this interrogation and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you're entitled to. KEENAN
BARNETT
KEENAN
BARNETT
|
|
RamNation.com is an independent publication and is not affiliated with, or endorsed by, |
|
|
Copyright © RamNation.com - All Rights Reserved |